For more commentary by this reviewer, travel to his Letterboxd page at https://letterboxd.com/haroldbleacher/ .
TundraBon
  • Home 🏠
  • The Scale ⚖
  • Reviews ✍
  • * Data Dump *
  • The Directory [Section A] 🔗
  • The Directory [Section B] 🔗
  • Tables of Content 📊
  • 🔑 Storage Locker ⏩
  • The Best 🏆
  • The Best Part 2 🏆
  • 🥕 Nonspecific Data Dump 📺
  • 🎶 Movie Music 🎼
  • Short Stories and Other Works 👀
  • My Mom's Data Dump 👩
  • Franchise Ranks
  • Hero Time with Ben 10 ⌚

Kenneth branagh's Cinderella

3/13/2015

Comments

 
                                                                                          3 1/4 /5
    The remake of the Disney animated classic has now been released.  I suppose now I should compare and contrast the two.  The original movie had a nice sense of comedic timing, a good heart, and an apt villain in the evil stepmother.  In later years Walt Disney Pictures released two sequels, the first making me cringe just thinking about it, and the second one ultimately perplexing and delighting me at the same time, though I did feel like it, too, was a money grab.

    Speaking of which, before one goes into this movie you wonder why else Disney would be releasing all these up-and-coming remakes of their classics except for that greedy bit of "dinero en efectivo".  I don't know for certain how the reissues of those other treasures will turn out, but if they are handled in the same way as Maleficent and this Cinderella, then they will also be painted with new coats of makeup over the original vintage exteriors, sometimes to surprising effect.

    That effect is felt in this movie.  The costumes, the architecture, even the looks and attitudes of the characters spell the words "fresh" and "crisp".  The idea of placing an African American in the role of the Captain looks inspired, as does the whole shebang.

    But there are certain other things to note.  For one, this film has lost much of its comedy in transition.  No, there is still some.  Just not enough to reach the heights of such scenes in the 1950 film with the mice trying to get things accomplished with Lucifer the cat skulking about.  Yes, the step sisters are still a big comedic outlet, copying some of the exact same traits from animation, though the hilarity isn't as bloated as the persona of the drawn, pointed girls' faces and the slapstick-like, boisterous actions that accompany them.

    The heart of this remake is still in the right place, as evidenced in the personal scenes given to the individual characters.  Yet the drama sometimes doesn't have such a heavy weight as it once did.  Before the ball, not much of the cruelty Cinderella has faced is shown, and the scene where the relatives-by-law tear her dress and she runs off crying isn't as shocking because, as a matter of fact, in this version the dress is only briefly attacked and not with a whole lot of intensity.

    In the original, the aging stepmother is viewed as menacing and cool with unpredictability and elegant, collected prowess.  Cate Blanchett is given a few places in this update where she gets to flaunt her deviousness, but she is no longer one we feel we have to tiptoe around, her character now imbued with some actual humanity, just not enough to get us too entranced with the relatively weak plot.

    You heard me.  Weak plot.  I have always found the story of Cinderella to be one of the least deserving tales in the past four centuries or so to get the attention that it has been given.  The thing that stands out the most is that Cinderella and the Prince fall in love after little interaction and plan on getting hitched to each other.  Prince Charming in this version, thank God, has a bit more than just a pretty face to his name.  Another plot deficiency is that most of the tale takes place during the time after the ball invites are given out and Cinderella fleas from the said occasion.  This time period typically encompasses too many extraneous scenes that don't add much to plot or characterization, save for the dress-ripping sequence, and mainly serves only for the fantasy backbone of the Fairy Godmother and her gifts.  To bring about a satisfying experience from these place-holding proceedings is not too easy, and can only be achieved if the main focus of the film is on the scenes before the ball notice goes out and after the Prince starts searching for the strange girl who left behind her glass slipper.  With the former, more is now provided, but containing mostly the couple preludes before and between the deaths of Cinderella's biological family, and not more of what we do need: to see more cruelty given by the new family to encourage us to get excited over the bits where poor Cinderella tries to reach her happy ending and escape an abusive household.  The 1950 film captured that well, and provided more compassion for Cinderella because she loses her family and is exposed to adversity from other human beings at a very young age, becoming a very shy person that lets others push her around too often.  Unlike that film, this Cinderella is already a teenager and almost fully developed when she is made a labor slave, so she is more rebellious and outspoken.

    My favorite adaptation of Cinderella so far is still the one in which Drew Barrymore stars, where political subtext is handled in a charming, post-feminist way throughout, all the characters have life and are not thin caricatures, and the plot and story are fully realized.

    With this new film, the stars are likeable and the cinematography, visuals, and settings are gorgeous and pleasing to the eyes.  In the end, though, the portions of the film that are given the most focus matter the most, especially with a thin, easy-to-be-unfocused tightrope of a plot like this.
Sadly, this movie in that area is more give-and-take.


Picture
Picture
Comments

Hostel

3/4/2015

Comments

 
                                                                                          2 1/4 /5
    Okay, cinemagoers.  You want to really know what I thought of this gorefest?  Here goes.  This movie is about an hour and a half long.  For the first 30 or so minutes the audience gets to see a few horny boys chase after women and try to have sex with them, expose their rear ends on public transportation, and get high on drugs they slurp up greedily.  I tried to be patient, even though I just wanted to get up and leave.  Where was the dang horror movie I was wanting to see?  I didn't pay money for this load of garbage.  Ick.

    But then, oh, but then, I guess I was asking for it.  Because then I was all of a sudden assaulted by some of the most graphic, gory images I have ever been exposed to on film.  Many people will try and compare this movie to the Saw films.  Well, I got some news for you buddies. This movie isn't as creative as Saw, it isn't as thrilling as Saw, it isn't as visceral as Saw, it isn't even as, God help me, sophisticated as Saw.  This is a gritty movie that doesn't realize that the audience needs to be able to sympathize with its protagonists before we can get reeled into their story enough.  Yes, in light of these sudden dark events these people realize what they've been doing with their lives is wrong.  But by then, we don't care.  We've already wasted enough time pushing our way through these immature boys' sexual fantasies, and with only an hour left on the clock, we just want to be be scared already.  Plus, there are also a few times where I think they were trying to convey anti-American sentiment, but it gets washed away with the real theme:  All people in general tend to be foul expletives.

    Yes, this movie does have some pluses.  That's why it doesn't go below 2 stars.  Some torture techniques and images seem unique and bold for cinema, the atmosphere is most certainly surreal in the death warehouse, and a few scenes try to promise a sly, dark comedy like the original (The) Texas Chain Saw Massacre.  Oh, how I wished that the writers and director would have given us more scenes with the gang of young, gum-chewing kids that aren't afraid to bash and stomp a few heads in when people don't pay the toll.

    But again, it all comes down to how we feel about the characters and if the movie does a good enough job of scaring us.  Just when we are about to start cheering the protagonists on the film ends.  We're just left hanging.  If the movie supplied another 20 to 40 minutes the suspense would have been allowed to start kicking in.  But, because we aren't given time to get excited, neither are we allowed the time to be scared.  This movie, with the proper script, might have been so much better.  Sadly, the closest I got to being scared was at the end of those first 30 minutes, when I was worried that the movie wasn't just torture porn, but simply a pornography movie in disguise as horror.
Picture
Picture
Comments

Quotes to Note Part 1

3/3/2015

Comments

 
The Matrix Revolutions:  "Mr. Anderson.  Welcome back.  We...missed...you."  "It ends tonight."

Picture
Picture
The Lion King:  "Run, Simba.  Run away and never return."
Picture
Spaceballs: "What's wrong, Colonel Sanders?  Chicken?!"
Picture
Comments
    To find a specific review, The Directory could help.  The tab for The Directory can be found on the top of the page.

    Archives

    April 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    September 2020
    January 2018
    August 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    September 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015

    Author

    Hello.  I am el Cirujano de Palabras, the Word Surgeon.  This blog is meant to both enlighten and entertain the reader.  Please excuse how long it takes for a new post to be submitted.  I am a very busy person, and I sometimes have trouble getting my thoughts in order.  But feel free to comment or leave any complaints or concerns you may have, as long as they wouldn't be considered vulgar by the general population or be viewed as being irrelevant to anything provided on the website.  Thanks! 

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

    0 - 1 3/4 Stars = Worst
    2 - 2 7/8 Stars = Bad
    ------------------------------------
    3 - 3 1/8 Stars = Average      3 1/4 - 3 3/8 Stars = Above Average or Mixed
    ------------------------------------
    3 1/2 - 4 Stars = Good
    4 1/8 - 5 Stars = Best

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.